Who's playing the race card NOW?

Hair-raising?More hard-hitting MSM coverage of Michelle Obama.

HERE WE GO AGAIN...AND AGAIN...AND AGAIN!

Asian - American Michelle Malkin posted this comment on her website making a reference to an article by Time Magazine, the new " Society of Culture Expertise, and we must add PHD. in Psychology of the minds of women and their hair"-mmm-interesting. The post states:

"The choice many black women make to alter their hair’s natural texture has undeniable historical and psychological underpinnings. It has been attributed to everything from a history of oppression and assimilation to media-influenced notions of beauty…". This comment was made in reference to "Ivey-League Educated, Michelle Obama, whom happens to be the "First Lady of the United States...ouch!

1. Does this comment apply to "Caucasian Women" when they decide to braid their hair or not get a perm, or just simply decide to color their hair"?

2. Does this comment apply to "Hispanic American Women" when they decide not to speak or even learn spanish? How about if they decide not to speak spanish in their homes or change the color/texture of their hair?

3. Does this comment apply to "Asian American Women", when they change their looks in order to look more "Americanized"?

In 2006, Eliza Noh, an assistant professor of Asian American studies at California State University at Fullerton, did research in reference to Asian-American women committing suicide due to the fact her younger sister had committed suicide. Professor Noh, stated her sister had issueses with her looks. "She hated looking Asian-American and under went cosmic surgery" and had a European bridge put in her nose and eye-widening folds in her upper lids before committing suicide. Professor Noh also stated "Many of my interviewees said they were affected by these dualistic images, either as hyper-sexualized and domineering, or passive and submissive," Noh said. These images, she said, combined with familial expectations, narrow the spectrum for Asian women's sense of identity and self-worth.

Does the statement from Michelle Malkins website in reference to black women apply to Professor Noh's sister, an Asian-American woman?The issues and circumstances appears to be the same as the ones describing black women and their hair. Or is this Michelle Malkin once again playing the race card? Absolutely! Cat-Litter Politics at its best....full of @#%^.

Professor Eliza Noh, PHD. Psychology

Asian American Studies/California State University, Fullerton

Sources: Article written by Malena Amusa for "Women's ENews"

"For some moments in life there are no words"~David Seltzer

When he shall die
Take him and cut him out in little stars
And he will make the face of heav'n so fine
That all the world will be in love with night
And pay no worship to the garish sun.


~William Shakespeare

Michelle Malkin is a wackjob…so sue me.

Update: Wackjob Michelle Malkin takes to twitter....should of stayed in her litterbox!

Wacko Jacko Czar Michelle Malkin is doing what she does best. "milking money from the Liberals" with her hot air. Former President George W. Bush Science Czar
Dr. John Harmen Marburger, III was no "Einstein". But of course, he was the great President George W. Bush, whom the "right" sees no fault. Yeah...that is the former President George W. Bush new name "no- fault GWB". Keep in mind "no-fault GWB" nomination of Dr. John Harmen Marburger, III did not go without controversy. The New York Times reported "But the tardiness of the nomination could present its own problems for Dr. Marburger. The Bush administration's decision on whether to allow federal financing of research involving human fetal tissue and fertilized eggs -- research that could be useful in treating diseases like diabetes but is opposed by some groups -- could come this month, long before confirmation hearings." aaahhh... he was nominated late why? Where was Jacko Wacko Michelle Malkin back then? Oh yeah, Dr. Marburger was a Democratic. How you like that "Cat Lady".Now back to Cat Litter Politics with a quote from Michelle Malkin "I called him a wackjob because he is a wackjob, and HuffPo’s best efforts to spin his work — which people can read themselves— can’t mask the truth". Proves once again to be very weak and opinionated reporting from the Cat Lady. Hey, "Cat Lady" you are out of your league with the Huffington Post. I strongly suggest you stay in your litter box.

Tavis Smiley...A Woman Scorned? absolutely!

Did anyone have the liberty to see Tavis Smiley on "Meet the Press" with none other than "Joe Scarbourgh"mmmm...they know how to team them up. But I must concentrate on Mr. Smiley. Wow!!! a book on grading "President Obama". Just a reminder Mr. Smiley the black community needed uplifting during "the Clinton, Bush Sr. and oh my God, Bush Jr. adminstration and exactly where were you and your scorecard? My goodness, did you embarass the black community today on Meet the Press. You come off with such jealousy and the Republicans, Conservatives, and oh yeah the "scorned women" are having a "Tea Party" in your honor. Why shame Black Leaders with your jealous outburst, you can hardly contain yourself when speaking of President Obama. Wow! the way you flip-flop to make it appear you don't have a hidden agenda. It is pathetic, almost like a "cat fight between two girls". Listing campaign promises, where were you when "Bush didn't deliver? Where was your book when "Hurricane Katrina" came, where was the "stance of uplifting the Black Community then? You are a woman scorned and a "call girl for the Republicans, when they call, you come with your book & scorecard. Remember what you said on CNN in reference to the now President not attending your very baseless Black Union Forum "Smiley made it clear he thought that was the wrong move. "I think it's a missed opportunity on Mr. Obama's part. Now, I am not interested in demonizing him for his choice, but I do disagree with it," he told CNN at the time." To Smiley, his stance was consistent with his long-standing mission to inform and uplift the black community. You are making money off of the Black Community with your "STANCE", now can you tell me exactly what it is that you do for the Black Community? Your not recognized as a leader, or a mentor. Your explanations for your book "Accountability:Making America as Good as Its Promise", and I quote you,"The ground is fertile for him to be a great president, but we have to hold him accountable to doing those things that he said he was going to do -- not out of casting aspersions on him, but out of loving him, because if he succeeds, there's a chance that we'll have somewhere down the road another black president, a woman president, but if he fails, it may be another 400 years before we get a black president."Posted by Sheryl H. Salomon on May 7th 2009 for Black Voices. I'm sorry, where were you during the 2008 elections? the audacity to state "it may be another 400 years before we get a black president" is an insult to African Americans, and the young adult American Citizens (18-24/25), whom turned out in "droves" in suport of a black nominee, and a woman nominee. Don't ever pigeon hold "Black America" or the youth of this generation, Mr. Smiley. They are a much stronger presence than you will ever be. Besides, you are only one vote:).

It’s enough to get you all wee-weed up over the Culture of Corruption!

Sneaky,Sneaky, Sneaky!!Michelle Malkin is milking money from the "Liberals she loves to hate' as she shyly promotes "wee-weed up" to hassle readers to buy her book. mmm...interesting..one of her lead stories this week is "Corporate Shills for Hope and Change" and lets not forget the "spotlight" Lecturer-on-Integrity-in-Public-Service David Axelrod. Blah, blah, blah....stick to substances, like the millions of Americans that are unemployed, Healthcare and a whole lot of other Cat Litter Politics. Blah, Blah, Blah, Sneaky, Sneaky, Sneaky..you go girl...promote your book...it is just so fabulous and well written that you don't have to promote it,Right? Wrong again.

Michelle Malkin...the Conservative Joker!!

The Conservative Joker...that's who?meow

Michellez Milk & her Cat Litter Politics ( we all know what cat litter is used for...meow) continues to advertise the picture of President Obama as the Joker with the words "free speech". Don't you just love it when the conservatives use "free speech" as a weapon for ignorance. Now, when the Bush administration was in office, this type of picture or behavior is unheard of and off limits to conservatives & all Americans. Why? because the Conservatives with their conservative values "would not even entertain the thought of such ridicule towards the "Bush Administration".Conservatives such as Michellez Malkin, Hannity, Ann Coulture and you know the rest, does not rule nor own the United States. So, there you have it...Michelle Malkin as the joker and of course, this is "free speech". Right Michelle?

To be continued...I'm sure (meowww)

Culture of Corruption-Hit or Miss?

The New York Times "Best Sellers"List? Amazon #1 booklist? mmm....food for thought. Has anyone seen the reviews or does the public review count. The good, bad and the ugly should all be accounted for. There are millions of Americans that will not buy the book and there are millions of Americans that will buy the book. Is the book a hit or miss? Well, it depends on who you ask. Now if you ask a talk show host ( and I mean any talk show host, Glenn Beck, Keith Olberman, Chris Wallace, Hannity etc.) you automatically get their personal views of Michelle squeezed into their book review. Now, again... if you ask a real Journalist...one that has established themselves "intellectually" as a Journalist....well, you get the "real deal book review". The book is a miss...young conservative Republicans tend not to agree with the radical approach. Society labels them as moderates. I tend to label them as "intellectuals" or "modern debaters". Michellez Milk book is clearly self-serving and opinionated. Don't get me wrong, everyone is entitled to their opinion.. but, spare me the kindness of "overbearing me with your opinion". Culture of Corruption is immensely "overbearing with self-serving opinions." Young Republicans such as Meghan McCain are more intellectual in their approach. They really don't see the radical approach as a measure of being heard. Why? Their education and merits plays an important part in their approach. Colleges are the most popular forum for "healthy debating". This is something the young Republicans take pride in, something that Michellez Milk is desperately trying to take away from them. Especially, in this book. This approach is getting really old. Sorry Michellez Milk, the "new" Young Republican Movement" are educated, tempermental, intellectuals with visions of getting their message to Americans with dignity, substance, respect and honor.

Michelle Malkin "milking money" from Liberals she loves to hate..? Say it aint so!

Michell Malkin is living off of the "Obamas"? Are you sure? Well, yes if you look to the left and no if you look to the right...So, which way do you look at her income? Well, lets start with her constant baggering of "First Lady Michelle Obama". In her new book she described the "First Lady" in reference to her ability to wear shirtless fashion and she goes on and on about the "First Lady's"appearance as a whole. Forgive me, if I am wrong, but...has Michelle took a good look in the mirror lately. You know the Liberals that "buy her groceries, clothing, and oh yeah help pay her "Healthcare Insurance" could attack her appearance. However, a good Journalist does not attack someone's looks, or fashion choices, unless they are the fashion police. Michelle Malkin is no "Fashion Police". Lets be honest, Michelle looks aren't the best and she continues to tour the talk shows circuit with her wekk-known antics of describing "liberals" from head to toe. I strongly suggest she consider "fixing her teeth" with all that Liberal money she is milking. Her constant badgering, whining, and sloppy presentations on air in reference to her beliefs and books is a waste of the television audience and the readers time. I say, stick to the facts!. The problem is that Michelle Malkin cannot make any money, if she solely sticks to the facts. But hey, she graduated from "Oberlin College" a long way from "Harvard, Priceton or Yale". The "First Lady is Ivey League Educated", Michelle Malkin does not stand a chance in the same arena as the "First Lady", regardless of the First Lady 's "ability to wear sleeveless fashion or whether she is "African American, White, Latina, Cuban..ect." Michelle Malkin is no match for any "First Lady" past or current. She makes these statements in her book to spearhead her sells. The Obamas, whether you like them or not...is her "SOURCE OF INCOME". She thrives off of calling the "First Lady" names, almost like a middle schooler or maybe even an elementary jibe at at classmate. It's tasteless and self-serving. She constantly attacks the hand that "feeds her", which is the "Obama Administration". Again, lets be honest. She absolutely plans and orchestrates her "Media Frenzy" geared toward a fan base of Americans from the "good ole boys club" so to speak. Remember there were millions that voted for McCain, just because President Obama was the opponent. Without the Obama's Administration "no one would be talking about Michelle Malkin." Her books are soley to feed her family and of course give them the best healthcare possible. Now, back to the question"Michelle Malkin" living off of liberals, the Obamas? Of course she is. A good Journalist does not attack the oppositions character or characteristics, a good Journalist sticks to the facts. Michellez Milk as I affectionally call her... (because she is milking the Liberals for money)..should consider Journalism 101 and take Laura Ingram, and Ann Coulture both back to school with her.