Michelle Malkin is a wackjob…so sue me.
Update: Wackjob Michelle Malkin takes to twitter....should of stayed in her 
litterbox!
litterbox!
Wacko Jacko Czar Michelle Malkin is doing what she does best. "milking money from the Liberals" with her hot air. Former President George W. Bush Science Czar
Dr. John Harmen Marburger, III was no "Einstein". But of course, he was the great President George W. Bush, whom the "right" sees no fault. Yeah...that is the former President George W. Bush new name "no- fault GWB". Keep in mind "no-fault GWB" nomination of Dr. John Harmen Marburger, III did not go without controversy. The New York Times reported "But the tardiness of the nomination could present its own problems for Dr. Marburger. The Bush administration's decision on whether to allow federal financing of research involving human fetal tissue and fertilized eggs -- research that could be useful in treating diseases like diabetes but is opposed by some groups -- could come this month, long before confirmation hearings." aaahhh... he was nominated late why? Where was Jacko Wacko Michelle Malkin back then? Oh yeah, Dr. Marburger was a Democratic. How you like that "Cat Lady".Now back to Cat Litter Politics with a quote from Michelle Malkin "I called him a wackjob because he is a wackjob, and HuffPo’s best efforts to spin his work — which people can read themselves— can’t mask the truth". Proves once again to be very weak and opinionated reporting from the Cat Lady. Hey, "Cat Lady" you are out of your league with the Huffington Post. I strongly suggest you stay in your litter box.
Dr. John Harmen Marburger, III was no "Einstein". But of course, he was the great President George W. Bush, whom the "right" sees no fault. Yeah...that is the former President George W. Bush new name "no- fault GWB". Keep in mind "no-fault GWB" nomination of Dr. John Harmen Marburger, III did not go without controversy. The New York Times reported "But the tardiness of the nomination could present its own problems for Dr. Marburger. The Bush administration's decision on whether to allow federal financing of research involving human fetal tissue and fertilized eggs -- research that could be useful in treating diseases like diabetes but is opposed by some groups -- could come this month, long before confirmation hearings." aaahhh... he was nominated late why? Where was Jacko Wacko Michelle Malkin back then? Oh yeah, Dr. Marburger was a Democratic. How you like that "Cat Lady".Now back to Cat Litter Politics with a quote from Michelle Malkin "I called him a wackjob because he is a wackjob, and HuffPo’s best efforts to spin his work — which people can read themselves— can’t mask the truth". Proves once again to be very weak and opinionated reporting from the Cat Lady. Hey, "Cat Lady" you are out of your league with the Huffington Post. I strongly suggest you stay in your litter box.
Labels: Wackjob
posted by Michellez Milk at
1:41 PM
4 Comments:
I see there are 5 more entries since last I wrote, There seems to be something lacking in the substance of these and it is of the same nature. The theme of these are repeating some news and introducing some clever nicknames to the public figures in the news story. I suspect these clever nicknames assigned to yourself and the public figures do not achieve the intended effect. Do not become discouraged. Unless this site is for your own amusement, you want to convey some individual ideas that are your's alone. This blog remains style over substance, you should aim for style AND substance.
Sorry, Cat Litter Politics do not respond to anonymous comments. This site was created for healthy debates from honest people. Sending anonymous comments is neither healthy for debating nor is it being honest in reference to the people that are brave enough to post comments without hiding behind the pen...so to speak.
Thanks for visting, you were #117 for viewing on August 26, 2009:))We appreciate you stopping by...do come again!
I happen to disagree with the both of your post. It should be ok to post anonymous, it makes it more interesting. I also happen to like the site and disagree with the assertion of style over substance. If it is true what the above "anonymous post" stating in reference to "repeating news and introducing clever nicknames" (and I must add, the post did say "clever nicknames") there must be substance, if it was already news???? so, i really don't see the point of the post. It's a little shallow to me. The site has a point of view and a subject, the subject is Michelle Malkin (usually) and the point of view is "DISAGREEMENT". I agree the "clever nicknames" are witty, sharp and CLEVER. I tend to like the site. My issue is the site does not post enough. I would like to see more in order to start a "healthy debate" more blogging. Now there, I said it and I posted anonymous.
my first time visiting. thought i would join the discussion. anonymous 1 must be kidding. repeating news is exactly what bloggers do. this site appears to be mocking conservative michelle malkin and you don't seem to like it. i have seen some really vicious blogging on michelle malkin. however, this blogger site is just pure mockery on behalf of another blogger that happens to be michelle malkin. no big deal. the site is a good read and in some odd way enjoyable. anonymous 2 thought posting anonymous makes it interesting, i agree to a point. I am wondering if michellez milk realize there are limited options for the person commenting to leave their name. whomever should look into that. also, michellez milk has two sites, both are good reads. the other sites talks about immigration and michelle malkin, bouth of you should check out the other site.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home